Child Support Estimator
Estimate monthly child support obligation using your state's published guideline formula. The 50 states use one of three models: Income Shares (38 states + DC + Guam + Virgin Islands), Percentage of Obligor Income (6 states — Alaska, Arkansas, Mississippi, Nevada, North Dakota, Wisconsin), or the Melson Formula (3 states — Delaware, Hawaii, Montana). The same family income can produce ~30% different obligations across models. This estimator surfaces your state's primary statute, applies its formula to your inputs, and shows the math step by step. Outputs are estimates for educational use — actual support orders require court filing through a licensed family-law attorney in your state.
- Combined income(Obligor + custodial)
- $6,000
- Obligor income share
- 66.7%
- Base obligation
- $800
- + Add-ons(Apportioned by income share)
- $400
- × Custody adjustment
- −0.0%
- = Monthly support
- $1,200
Blue = base obligation and apportioned add-ons. Orange = the final monthly support after the shared-custody adjustment. It states the math; it does not tell you what to file.
View the TypeScript implementation on GitHub: packages/calc/src/child-support-estimator.ts · view tests
What this means
There is no single national child-support formula. The state you file in decides which of three models applies, and the same family income can land roughly 30% apart depending on which one runs. Income Shares pools both parents’ incomes and splits the state’s basic obligation by who earns what. Percentage of Obligor Income looks only at the paying parent and applies a flat statutory rate. Melson reserves a self-support floor for the obligor, apportions the children’s primary need, then layers a Standard of Living Allowance on top. This estimator runs whichever model you pick against the guideline figures you supply — it never assumes one state’s table.
In my experience, the number people fixate on — the headline monthly figure — is the least portable part of the whole exercise. Move the same parents across a state line and the model changes underneath them. I’ve found the more useful thing this tool does is make the mechanics visible: you can see the base obligation, watch the add-ons get apportioned by income share (or added in full under the percentage model), and see exactly where the shared-custody reduction kicks in. That transparency is the point — not a verdict on what you should do.
I’ve seen the shared-custody piece cause the most confusion, so it’s worth being plain: the adjustment here is a deliberately simple linear reduction above a threshold. Real states use 92, 110, or 128-night cutoffs and very different mechanics — sliding scales, cross-credits, or dropping out of the guidelines entirely for equal time. Treat the shared-custody output as a directional estimate, and treat the whole result as a starting point for a conversation with a licensed family-law attorney in your state — never as a substitute for one.
Worked example
Take the default Income Shares case: an obligor earning $4,000/month, a custodial parent earning $2,000/month, 2 children, a state basic obligation of $1,200/month, $200 in child health premium, $400 in work-related childcare, and 80 overnights with the non-custodial parent against a 92-night threshold.
Combined income is $4,000 + $2,000 = $6,000, so the obligor’s income share is $4,000 ÷ $6,000 = 66.7%. The base obligation is the state figure times that share: $1,200 × 0.667 = $800. The $600 of add-ons apportions by the same share: $600 × 0.667 = $400. At 80 overnights — below the 92-night threshold — the shared-custody reduction is 0%. So monthly support is ($800 + $400) × 1 = $1,200, or $14,400 per year.
Now watch the model swing. Run the same obligor through Percentage of Obligor Income at a 20% rate and the base is $4,000 × 20% = $800 — but the add-ons get added in full, not apportioned. Run it through Melsonwith a $1,500 self-support reserve and a 10% SOLA, and the base becomes the income-share slice of the primary need plus 10% of the obligor’s post-reserve income — a materially different path to a similar neighborhood. Same family, three formulas, three answers. That spread is exactly why the model your state uses is the single biggest variable, and why this is an estimate to take to an attorney, not a figure to file on.
Frequently asked questions
The information and tools on this website are for general educational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Consult a licensed professional for decisions specific to your situation.